The European Central Bank must be reading the Trumpo Blog
Following on from Wednesday’s blog this week the ECB pumped in an unprecedented 349bn Euros into the money markets yesterday.
Trumpo only requested £50 bn on Wednesday - it must be Christmas.
The money received 390 bids for the funding, which was offered at a rate of just 4.21%.
Trumpo can see a little light at the end of the tunnel, but I am going to have a rant anyway. Here goes…
One of the main issues we currently have is that the banks and finance houses have clients who want to borrow, but the main clearing banks and building societies have had to tighten their credit scores to such a level, under stringent FSA “responsible lending” directives, that the consumers who had previously been able to borrow at a fair and reasonable rate, are now forced running to ridiculously high interest rate doorstep lenders, the largest of which Provident, reported a dramatic upturn in business to record levels this week. Good for Provident shareholders, bad for the consumer.
As Trumpo writes this blog, we have a dual class lending and borrowing system in place - it really is like “Upstairs Downstairs”. It may look like an opportunity for lenders to hike rates and boost margins, at the expense of the people the regulators are supposed to protect - the consumer, or them downstairs. But Trumpo’s opinion is that it’s a result of the current regulatory framework.
On the one hand the regulator is saying to the high street banks, you must lend responsibly and if people can’t afford it then you shouldn’t lend to them, however we have £1.4 trillion currently lent to these now blackballed consumers, who by the way have had to stomach 5 interest rate rizes in the last twelve months.
If these now deemed irresponsible borrowers need a new car, kitchen or perish the thought actually move house, they are penalised to such a dramatic level because the banks tweeked the “responsible lending” computer system to only allow people to borrow who don’t need it and if these preferred borrowers want to borrow, the rates are now sometimes less than they can receive in their savings accounts!
Today’s taxpayer, who in most instances can’t actually afford to save because of the increased taxes and cost of must have fuels and foods, are having their hard earned taxes, lent at a low “Upstairs” rate to Northern Rock Bank at the current level of £2,000 per tax payer and rising. The “Downstairs” taxpayers money is being used to prop up other peoples savings - am I missing something here or is this government and regulator taking the preverbial?
Now, where is Jeeves with my tea?
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

December 20th, 2007 at 2:31 pm
Spot on, a point I’ve been making on housepricecrash.com
December 20th, 2007 at 2:36 pm
I thought this was how supply & demand works. There is no right to a mortgage or a loan. Borrowers are not penalised if they pay a higher market rate any more than they are penalised by the higher price of buying a Porsche.
It’s always been the case that lenders lend to those that don’t need to borrow.
It’s always been a fact that a good credit history will attract better rates.
So what’s the problem?
December 21st, 2007 at 10:25 am
Oh come on Delboy, in your ivory tower over there! You are missing the point. In this day of Big brother and credit scoring it is very easy to become “Sub Prime”. All it takes is a late credit card repayment ot going s few pounds over your overdraft limit. As a mortgage broker I see hundreds of clients who are classed as “sub prime” and then they get hit with horrific interest rates for borrowing. Too many companies now rely on automated credit ratings. This specifically hits the 10 Milllion self employed wgo are often paid late and then its the domino effect! Have some empathy for those who are trying to make a living and these people who then find themselves having to pay over the odds for borrowing. So Trumpo’s view is on the money!!