Successful Debt Management Plans are now in the tax payers interest.
It looks like the year ahead is going to be more challenging than expected and trusted advice is going to be needed now more than ever.
Trumpo has been speaking to many advisers who are now turning from mortgage adviser to debt adviser.
100,000’s of family incomes will be reducing this year as a result of the credit crunch, and these clients are the most vulnerable and most in need of professional debt advice. The citizens advice bureau and the many other charitable debt organisations operating should be praised, but they are terribly under resourced and the individuals concerned lack the qualified financial services experience needed to manage the explosion of financially distressed families expected to need help over the next couple of years.
During the last ten years, if a client needed to reduce their monthly outgoings, a re-mortgage or a consolidation loan was the normal course of action taken by millions of people. This solution is now basically extinct.
The Banks are no longer providing funding solutions for consolidation, and this is creating a massive debt time bomb, not the actual amount of debt, as this is currently static at approximately £1.4 trillion – it’s the actual servicing of the debt. Millions of people over the coming years are not going to be able to repay it, mainly as a result of job loss or reducing levels of income.
In the current economic crisis, the banks are under increasing regulatory pressure to maintain certain levels of excess capital on their balance sheets to operate.
Example:
If a client owes £10,000 on a credit card, this is treated as an asset/debtor on the banks balance sheet.
If the client or business goes bust, then the bank needs to replace the value of £10,000 so the balance sheet does not worsen.
Put simply the bank would need to make £10,000 profit to neutralise the damage to its balance sheet of 1 bad credit card debt.
To recoup this loss the bank needs in the region of £1M of new cash deposits, to lend out or put to use over the year, to hopefully deliver a minimum profit margin of 1%/£10,000.
With interest rates at all time lows, loan and mortgage arrears increasing, the banks are finding it near impossible to attract the required levels of deposits to bolster their balance sheets. The Govt’s bank bail out, to prevent the UK banks balance sheets collapsing completely, required the pumping in of £10’s billions of taxpayers money.
Trumpo predicts we will see a further £50 Billion pumped into the banks within the next six months, due to the continuing number of loans and mortgages going bad.
But where does this leave the poor and over indebted consumer? With a further 1 million people expected to be in dire straits in 2009, this needs dealing with NOW!
The interest rate drops are going a long way to help those on tracker/variable rate mortgages, freeing up monthly cash to ease the financial pressures, but it does however only help half of all mortgage payers. What we need is a government directive encouraging all banks and credit card companies to agree to freeze interest rates for genuinely distressed families, and allow these families/persons the ability to get their personal finances back on track, and they can do this by taking out a professionally organised debt management plan.
The mortgage/debt advisers, who arrange these debt management plans, can then legitimately get people onto an even keel. Historically; 10,000’s of people on debt management plans have actually seen their debts increase, because the banks and credit card companies in the past would keep piling on the unpaid interest to the original outstanding debts, making a bad situation worse. These type of debt management plans are not in anyone’s interest and should not in most cases have ever been advised to be set up.
If a mortgage/debt adviser identifies that a client can’t afford to meet their monthly bills and their debts are actually increasing, they can help their clients by negotiating to freeze unaffordable interest payments, to stop the position worsening.
The adviser can then agree to structure a repayment plan of the acutal debts over an affordable period, ensuring that the client can meet essential monthly outgoings such as mortgage, food, gas etc, and any spare cash would go to reduce their debts. This approach has to be in the banks long term interest, clients interest and now the TAX PAYERS interest. The debts stay as an asset on the banks balance sheet, as opposed to being written off in the event of Bankruptcy, thereby the banks and tax payers should get their money back over time.
Well thats the plan.
Who would have ever thought, that one tax payer, would have a vested interest in making sure loans and credit cards were actually repaid by fellow tax payers?
Your constructive Trumpo.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

January 14th, 2009 at 9:25 am
However you butter this up, its to earn commission out og joe public. Dyson hoovers, double glazing, endowments, pensions, now debt management. All the companies I have seen are charging, leave it to Citizens Advice Bureau. The public have been ripped off enough by Gordon Brown, without this con.
January 14th, 2009 at 9:56 am
I think the CAB do a great job, but for the larger indebted consumer, i.e. over £25,000 worth of debt, it needs to be professionaly handled.
Plus the CAB have not got enough staff, if the govt allocated a fraction of the bail out money given to the banks the CAB may have a fighting chance.
January 14th, 2009 at 9:59 am
Sorry, I forgot to add, with the CAB, any structured plan has to be administered by the person who got themsleves into trouble in the first place – so the failure rates due to poor administration (i.e. 1 person)very high.
Hence professional administration best chance of recovery.
January 14th, 2009 at 10:25 am
we all have to make a living somehow, charging a fee for a service is nothing new especially if that service such as debt management can save someone’s home etc. Having dealt with the CAB and other Government organizations in the past I know that the consumer has a choice, either let CAB (with the best will in the world)take their time over matters but ultimately provide nothing more than guidance, or employ a professional to ensure the job is done properly in a reasonable period of time. You wouldn’t necessarily fit your own double glazed windows or take a punt on what might be the most suitable pension. Sometimes you have to trust in the independent advice of the relevant professional, if the CAB can’t cope with what will be a massive influx of debt related enquiries what is Joe Public expected to do?
January 14th, 2009 at 10:55 am
What we need to remember is a properly managed debt management scheme is the only way forward for a vast majority of the UK public. Over the last ten years much of the British public have ran up record levels of unsecured debt with many relying on the increase in property values to bail them out of trouble every 2 – 3 years with a debt consolidation secured loan or re-mortgage, many of these clients have borrowed up to 90% – 95% of there property value with some lenders even offering 125% LTV consolidation loans at the high of the credit/property boom.
These borrowers will now find it very difficult to find a new mortgage deal and will typically still have around £25,000.00 of unsecured debt. Moving forward the UK public must stop using their homes as cash cows to fund flash cars and expensive holidays and start reducing mortgage debt, their mortgage payments should and must be there number one priority.
With the increased mortgage debt and reducing incomes many will now only be able to prioritize their mortgage payment and essential living costs and will not be able to pay back unsecured debt at the contractual payment.
Because of this the UK public needs guidance on how to repay their debts and in my eyes a debt management plan is a better alternative to an IVA or bankruptcy or even worse case scenario loosing their home.
We all need to work together to reduce the UK indebtedness and if these means that some organisation or individuals make a living from doing this, is this such a bad thing?