www.trumpo.com | blog

FSA plonkers drop another clanger.

In what can only be described as a kick in the teeth for Mortgage Advisers, The FSA launches a campaign for the public to go to the FSA website for mortgage guidance.

Is this regulator for real? It has been announced today by the FSA that they are to spend £2 Million, funded I might add by Mortgage Advisers annual regulatory fees, to market the FSA’s moneymadeclear website for help and guidance on a clients Mortgage if their about to come out of a fixed rate (or no doubt a back door help service if your with Northern Rock). Or if you find the website unhelpful, then to go and speak to your lender. And to top it all, some plonker from the FSA within the hour went public on BBC News 24 to say that if all else fails then go to an IFA!!! what about Mortgage Advisers? Does the FSA not know the difference?

It’s the FSA who have caused the current mortgage problems, not advisers. Customers to go to the FSA for help and guidance ? Give us a break - Mortgage Advisers do a bloody good job and what does the Mortgage Regulator do? Send our clients round the houses - it’s an absolute incompetent disgrace.

Trumpo is livid. 

Link to BBC story http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7275485.stm

del.icio.us Reddit Digg Facebook


You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

43 Responses to “FSA plonkers drop another clanger.”

  1. Pathetic. The very people who have caused many of the problems within this industry create yet more problems. How are the public meant to trust mortgage advisers when clearly the FSA do not?

  2. Robin Tedder Says:
    March 4th, 2008 at 11:29 am

    Well,

    In one sense thats all we need, however most of the great British Public have never heard of the FSA, its website or what it does, let alone be infuenced by an advertising campaign to encourage them to do so.

    As you can see I’m the eternal optomist, but I do contact my existing client bank regularly so my customers know what to do without any influence from the FSA.

  3. And why is it a statutory requirement that we pay FSA fees to incompetences we disagree with who we can’t even vote out!
    Time to become an employee of our clients, stop paying FSA fees, sit on a bar stool and just get paid in Beer and Potatoes rather than funding this Quango merrigo round of big salaries, final salary pensions and top dollar buildings ( canary wharf) when we all have to make do and mend!
    Parasites the lot of them.

  4. And when they do find criminal fraud, they ignore it. One firm was reported to them for £10 million of criminal fraud by it’s own compliance director (me). It took them 3 months to visit the firm by which time all documents had been shredded. The result? A £50,000 fine for the firm for inadequate/missing records, and nothing else! I was redundant the day I reported! Pathetic. Even after it was on Panorama they took no action.

  5. I wonder when number 10 will be open for mortgage advice and would you trust it.

  6. Does anyone actually know what the FSA do? And I agree with Robin above about the public never having heard of them. The FSA take your money and make you do a report every half year that nobody understands so I suppose its understandable why they want to throw £2 million into a fund that will upset everybody. We are a removal company so does that mean our fees contribution won’t go into that fund? What about insurance companies? Are the FSA holding different pots of money from all these different industries that have no choice but to pay them so that when they come up with these schemes they only take the money from the appropriate pot?

  7. alfie hall Says:
    March 4th, 2008 at 11:47 am

    I remember when the FSA took over the regulating of investments. They made a mess of that so I when back to being an engineer, now they are making a mess mortgages no has got their butt kick. Do not know how long we can last so time to go back and be an engineer again. I assume the FSA will take on more staff who do not have a clue how to sell a mortgage

  8. The FSA has proven itself to be totally incompetent. It costs millions yet generates NOTHING! It has crippled the once great Financial Services industry. It has created a monster in compliance officers all over the land who are frightened to death of them and creates NEW ideas which are ill thought out (e.g TCF) what a waste of time! and to top it all it allowed Northern Rock to fall, it only allocated NR 3 people to monitor it and basically had no idea of what NR was doing. Also it allowed the banks to lend money to the American “sub prime” market and did not understand what the banks were doing. When I joined the industry 28 years ago there were over 250,000 financial advisers and there were hundreds of companies advising people to take out pensions, savings and life insurances. Now there is less than 40,000 and millions of people are getting NO advice whatsoever! It makes my blood boil. Lastly how could the FSA allow Gordon Brown to have raided the pension funds of billions to the extent that he has robbed people of their pensions and companies have had to close their Final Salary schemes. I could go on about selling our gold reserves. But this note will go on for too long. Basically the FSA is a complete waste of time and money being the over compliant, misdirected monolithic organisation and really has no idea of what we mortgage brokers have to do on a daily basis to make a living. Grrrrrr!

  9. Am I being a little sensitive or is my current impression justified that the FSA seem to be systematically trying to erradicate the independent market?

    As Mortgage brokers, we have to compete at every turn for our business, not least with Lenders who generally do not offer competitive ‘coming out of product’ deals until their borroweres have hinted that they would be better off elsewhere, then its a slippery U turn and total reveal of the product basket.

    I am not a victim, and do not endorese the victim culture, but I am peeved that we have very little by way of effective professional representation to make a stand with us on issues that are important to our livelihoods.

    The effect of a few poor quality brokers getting things wrong has a limited and localised effect on consumers, but when institutions get it wrong [ppi to name but one]they do it big style and attract MASSIVE fines from the FSA.

    This is followed by much talk of nefarious practices by the media, resulting in the general public being advised to contact ‘web comparison sites, ’start with your current lender or shop around.

    The real truth is that the Independent Market is a thorn in the side of the corporations, who can apply their indecent marketing budgets to ’spin’ the public into believing what they want.

    It is not in the script for the public to think or take responsibility for themselves in any way, that function is left to the corporations to do it for them. The cunsumers job is to belive the best spin, play to the script and meekly allow themselves to continue to be ripped off.

    The FSA has grown like topsy, how many of them are there in this organisation now? What has it achieved? Are consumers more aware or better off? Where was the FSA when it came to spotting a looming credit crisis? Where was the Bank of England for that matter?

    But big organisations need big paymasters and if the corporations and institutions promised to be good little boys and girls the FSA would be perfectly happy with ‘Mac’ advice and agree to let them continue with business as usual provided that they agreed to pay sufficient levy.

    The Independent is dead, they just have not put the lid on the cofin yet. That is unless we make a stand, there are thousands of us for goodness sake. With the vast majority having a proven track record for integrity and honour and treating customers fairly. We bring in Billions of pounds of transactional business every year to the lenders, the trouble is that we operate alone, and in segregation. I am not talking about a network, [why fill their pockets with our money], but we do need some form of effective Union.

    If we dont learn to stand up for ourselves we can all expect to be ploughed under. Have a nice day.

  10. I am overwhelmed and proud with this response, come on ladies and gents keep these comments coming, we can make a difference, the people in the ivory tower are watching this blog - so let it rip, we are only being honest and open after all…

  11. PROFESSIONAL MORTGAGE SERVICES Says:
    March 4th, 2008 at 12:18 pm

    The FSA should be ashamed, at the rate they are going they will not only put Brokers out of a job but themselves as well. The public have enough trouble trusting us anyway without the FSA’s latest proposals.
    Our fees are increased every year and what do they do with the money they try and shut us down with their incompetence.
    Sorry do I sound bitter and twisted can’t think what makes me feel like that.

  12. Folks lets face it the FSA doesn’t care nor understand the mortgage industry and and doesn’t care about you or me - FSA employees fall into three camps-
    1 Career civil servants who carry no responsibility for their cock ups past their current positions whilst all the time looking forward to a state funded (by you and me) pension - The only real way to deal with incompetence within this quango is to promote it and give it a “gong”!
    2. Transient graduates who can’t get a decent offer anywhere else
    3. Workers who disappear under red tape
    They of course all believe that they do a fantastic job under tremendous pressure - deluded? yes - incompetent? yes - smug? you bet ya !

  13. Andy Brown Says:
    March 4th, 2008 at 12:30 pm

    Maybe its time we took advantage of our EUROPIAN rights and moved our licences etc to a eurpoean country then the Idiots who do sit in ivory towers might take heed when they are sent packing due to there own misconduct and Stupidity. I cant believe that our hard earned monies that we have to pay to these idiots is now being spent to inform lesser mortals that the bloody website is now the place to go WHAT HAS HAPPENED to good advice and knowing customers and treating them fairly it wasnt long ago that our sourcing systems were brought under scrutiny and then we are informed that we have to do more research to clarify the recommendations that we are giving personally i would love to see the FSA tosspots all FIRED and replaced with persons that are actually intouch with reality.

    And on a last note about treating customers fairly are we not customers to the so called Financial Services Authority

    come the revolution we will survive

  14. The FSA is a complete an utter waste of money
    Its red tape gone mad!
    Why did they allow companies to offer people mortgages that they could obviously could not afford ?
    Also Northern Rock and prior to that Equitable Life

    They know absolutley nothing apart from working from some
    ivory tower in London processing information that is pointless and basically just adding another TAX to business

    SHUT THE FSA DOWN AS SOON AS POSSIBLE

    Regards
    Kevin Hill

  15. It may as well be the Food Standards Agency for all the good the other FSA do!!!!!

  16. The FSA ought still be a valuable part of our industry if they thought a little harder about how to support quality brokers properly. Perhaps if they listened to some of them about the kind of support that is required to boost what is, in many ways, an ailing industry, and if heads were put together from all sides of the industry, a united front could be found where clients actually understood how useful a mortgage and protection broker can be. Who knows, we might once again become the natural choice for mortgage advice, instead of the internet…. IFA’s have their place as well, in fact many mortgage brokers are IFA’s (in the real sense of the word, not just in terms of whether they charge fees or not….another FSA recently caused misnomer), and again, we should all be working together.

    Instead however, they appear to be proceding to put red tape in the way of brokers and red herrings in the way of clients so that the industry is becoming less clear. This is a real shame after M-Day, when the FSA did actually seem to have some sensible ideas on how to move the industry forward.

    Their (our) fees should be spent very simply - get rid of any Bad Advisers altogether (IFA, Mortgage, or otherwise), and then help the UK Public to WANT to come to the remaining quality individuals and firms who exist. Anything else is just muddying waters and removing value from the services we provide and industry we are fighting for everyday.

  17. Peter C - You beat me to it!

    The saddest thing is they probably came up with this nugget over a champagne lunch in their exclusive dining room at head-quarters! A lunch paid for by the people they are intent on irradicating!

    It’s is another badly aimed attack at the people who provide them with the knowledge on how to run their ship.

  18. I am happy to see the general feeling is that the FSA are letting us all down badly. Come out from your ivory towers and see that you are not treating US fairly and YOU are lucky that you cannot be voted out. Your levels of incompetence increase every year and your grasp of the financial services industry is becoming increasingly tenuous. Northern Rock anyone? It was blindingly obvious that had a poor long-term proposition. Equitable Life? What a mess the FSA have made there too.

    For gods sake, let us do our jobs. The vast vast majority of brokers work unbelievably hard in hyper-competitive market conditions. The FSA do what most public sector companies do. Laze around doing little to actually help consumers and create more and more confusion and distrust of advisers.

    We are proud to offer free mortgage advice to our clients, who choose to come with us. You charge us a fortune every year for being part of a stupid organisation that has lost touch with its customers. Sorry for the rant but just a last note to the FSA. YOU ARE A DISGRACE.

  19. Beyond belief. The survey on this issue involved 543 people. Do they know there is life outside Canary Wharf? I wonder?

    The FSA are without doubt the biggest culprits in confusing the issue for the consumer.

    I resent them refering to our clients as customers.

  20. Come on guys- make a stand against these imbeciles. The more support we get the better.

  21. I have been in this idustry for 22 years prior to the iception of lautro. There was no doubt that there WAS a major need for regulation in the life industry and none of us I believe are against it.Now, however the situation has started to become intolerable and there seems that nothing can be done to control the monster that the FSA has become. The charges are disporortionate to the job and I for one resent the fact that they are spending £2 million of our hard earned yet easily taken fees on a website that is really not nessesary as there are plenty of sites already out there to use as well as IFA’s like us.
    The questions asked of such a small porportion of the population means that the results cannot be taken seriously and is akin to the 82% of people who have used a certain shampoo advertised have seem an improvement in their hair…out of a sample of 298 people!! I take that sample just as seriously.So perhaps we need a £2 million website to reduce dandruff, which, is also clearly a major issue affecting the public today

  22. Andrew Oliver Says:
    March 4th, 2008 at 2:34 pm

    Andrew Oliver & Co Ltd

    Who regulates the regulator.
    The checker needs checking.
    Its seems that the FSA is not accountable for how it spends our money.
    Read todays money marketing about mortgage fraud then ask the question is regulation working?

  23. Justin Thomas Says:
    March 4th, 2008 at 2:35 pm

    The FSA needs to decide whether it is in the advice business or the regulatory business. If the former, it should raise its funding from those who seek guidance; we have to. It is as congruous as IFAs funding Citizens Financial Advice Bureaus in their locality so that people can go and obtain free advice from there. Maybe we could extend it even further so Solicitors could finance Citizens Legal Advice Bureaus and Accountants local Citizens Accountancy Bureaus so folk could have free legal and accounting advice. Just think where all this could end.

  24. Thank heavens I am not the only one who thinks the F.S.A. HAS LOST THE PLOT.!!!!!! I have been in the Bank and mortgage and finance business for 46 years now [I am 64 years old GRUMPY OLD MAN] It is hard to believe any industry will accept such a load of incompetence from educated people . I for one will take any action needed to show this government how these clowns are wasting our money and our reputations. I have been an HONEST BROKER for all these years and I do not need to be taught by fools how to deal with the public. Maxi [TRUE INDEPENDENT and proud of it]

  25. We are just a small vehicle leasing brokerage who registered with the FSA from day one in order to distance ourselves from some of the more unscrupulous individuals operating in the market. What that means though is that we are now compelled to sell more Insurance products each year at a higher profit level than before just to cover our costs. How does that benefit the customer? More often than not, I was happy to throw a GAP Policy in for free previously. Now they have too pay a market rate for it - and all to keep the idiots at the FSA in clover.

    The reporting is out of all proportion to the amount of policies we write and if I tell them a day too late that there is nothing to report they fine me - for having to tell them nothing! Okay, that happened just the once (the first time) and yet there is no discretion. We are all made to feel like criminals and yet the majority of us only ever want to do the best we can for our customers.

    It wouldn’t be so bad if you can call them to ask for their guidance on an issue - but anyone you speak to at the FSA can’t interpret their own rules!! I know, because I’ve tried it. All you can do is to try something and hope for the best. What way is that to run a Regulatory body?

    Under this Government business is drowning in a sea of red tape and regulations, and there is no-one any of us can turn to. You know why - because it’s all controlled by the EU!!

  26. Disgruntled Says:
    March 4th, 2008 at 3:16 pm

    If you actually use these tables you will find that they tell the consumer were the best deals are so they don’t need an advisor of any description, they can just go direct to te lender.
    I have been against this for many years as this is not a new thing, I found it when I was told to put a link on my KeyFacts page on my site to the FSA I soon found that the page I ended up on within the FSA site had access to these best buy tables and as I was not in the business to show my clients the door I refused to put the link on my site.
    What exactly is this organisation? A regulator or a competitor, as if it is the latter it seems strange that we have to fund them, don’t you think?

  27. Ben Leibek Says:
    March 4th, 2008 at 3:24 pm

    I believe this is a publicity stunt for the FSA more then anything.

    I guess the FSA are trying to put themselves under the lime light appearing to be acting and doing something positive in these turbulent times, after being wrist slapped and criticised for failing to regualte Northern Rock.

    For a body that stresses on regulated firms to have strong “Systems and Controls” to manage and monitor its afairs…surely they could do with using some of this wisedom within their own 4 walls when trying to regulate major corporations and protect the economy and most importantly the consumers from adverse effects.

  28. Hey Trumpo, I hope you are right in that the FSA do read this blog, because just reading the passion and anger in some of the inserts shows that we PROFESSIONALS are fed up, and that the FSA needs to wake up and SMELL THE COFFEE! We do NOT need more red tape, interference or misguided advice to our clients. We need support. We are the true independents who offer our clients true “best” most “Suitable Advice” we have having taken all the relevant exams, qualifications, have taken out Professional indemnity insurance,Data Protection Registration, Consumer Credit Licence etc etc. We are monitored on every piece of paper, last week I saw clients and had to get their signatures 26 TIMES, there was so much documentation!! Guess where the requirement for that lot come from. … the FSA!!! They simply have no idea. What happened to the promise of LESS red tape!! Less bureaucracy ?
    I am fast losing the will and strength to continue in this industry and thats 28 years of my life, thousands of satisfied clients and NOT 1 single complaint? Could the FSA say the same????
    Time it was replaced with a more business sensitive profile and had REAL brokers on its board who can look out for the reality of life in this business. Has the FSA got any Brokers or EX brokers on its board??
    I am so angry ……..

  29. Well, I thought I was alone in my thoughts of the mighty FSA!! Living a mainly nocturnal workstyle, 7 days a week, I rarely meet many other IFA’s or Mortgage Brokers, to get a feel for their views. I’m therefore amazed at the numbers of others that appear to share a view of this incongrous, expensive, unecessary organisation.

    Let’s march on Canary Wharf and give them what for. Oh yes, what a fantastic idea. Mmmmh, I’ll sleep well tonight jus thinking of it!

  30. Ladies and Gents; I have just returned from a meeting to find passionate and factual comment - Thank you.

    573 person research ? - within 5 hours we have received 700 visits on this subject alone, and at no cost - I wonder how much the research of the 573 cost; Tens of thousands of pounds of our fees I bet.

    It would be interesting if the FSA asked for professional feed back for once ??

  31. I cannot beleive how incompetent this quango is. They sit there in Canary Wharf not actually getting a feel for the industry. They are out touch with the real world. We should march on them, WHO DO THEY THINK THEY ARE.

  32. ENOUGH ! This is out of Control – I’m off !

    I have nothing against making this industry more Professional (that is how it was sold to us back Oct 2004) But when the regulator clearly does not understand the business they are regulating I think we have a problem.

    The introduced measures, endless admin, reporting and “guidelines” that do nothing to actually guide anyone in anything as they are so written in “Legalese” that you can’t understand them are doing nothing except to promote the ability for the Public to formulate a myriad of complaints based upon whatever spurious grounds against Advisors/Networks alike. The FoS needs to get out more and get a life, they clearly have no idea on how real life works and have no experience in the fine art of dealing with the Public ever in their lives, I firmly think the FoS are under the misguided impression that all the Public tell the truth ? - Perhaps things are different in Australia (which seems to be where most of them hail from).

    In my opinion the FSA have completely missed the point, they are not regulating, they are encouraging a very educated group of people who are always looking for a way to blame other people for their own misgivings and sue them for whatever they can get – The Public very ably supported by Solicitors looking for the next “Accident” claim opportunity.

    The rising mortgage interest rate caused by the Credit Crunch is not the main culprit causing the rise in repossessions in the UK – it is the level of unsecured debt on Credit Cards, Cars, Boats and God knows what. I dare say that if a Family in trouble were to disregard their unsecured debts from their monthly income they would be able to maintain their mortgage payments – but still Mortgage Advisors are blamed ?

    I have just had the FoS uphold a claim against my Firm because we did not call the Client back after 4 years ! The Client could not prove that we hadn’t called them and agreed that the Advisor even told them he was leaving. Be careful next time you say “See you later” - if you don’t - you might get sued !

    After 10 years and thousands of mortgages and happy Clients I have made the decision to withdraw from the market and will terminate my Company and association from the FSA. Not because I feel there is no future for the business but because the “Ambulance Chasers” are queuing up and the Mortgage Brokers are directly in their firing line, with a Regulator that is just rubbing their hands together in glee. Even if every case bought against you was won the time and administration involved defending these unjustified Claims render the risk/reward unviable.

    I wish you all who remain the very best of luck - truly.

    A VERY SAD JD from IMAS, Poole.

  33. I have been thinking about this overnight and tying up with money mentors thoughts on a union. As ifa’s we have to show due diligence and proof that ANY product offered to a client has been thoroughly researched to meet the clients needs yet the FSA are launching a £2 million website on the basis of a piece of research on 543 or so people!!This to me is not due dilligence and I just wonder whether an action could be taken through the courts to show the FSA have not done proper and correct research into the situation. It would certainly be worth considering I feel and would cause extreme embarresment to the fsa through press coverage. Your thoughts welcome

  34. Christopher Says:
    March 5th, 2008 at 10:34 am

    Well, we don’t have anything to worry about except the sheer waste of our money.

    I have just run a FTB search to see what my clients might find. Conclusions:

    1: The site asks a FTB:
    Q7. Over how many years do you want to repay the mortgage? People often assume the ’standard’ term is 25 years, but it can be for a shorter or longer than this.

    For FTBs in their 20s I discuss going for a 30 years term rather than the interest only that their friends encourage. The FSA sems to thinh a FTB can borrow for less than 25!!!

    8. Do you want to see monthly payments for a repayment mortgage or an interest-only mortgage? For more information click on the ‘Help’ button.

    Rather links to Q7 above.

    What professional - other than the FSA - would talk to a FTB about interest only?

    2: Failure to show true value for money.

    The web is full of sites with mortgage rates - but what about true value for money taking all fees and charges into account?

    The FSA list is no better than any other and does not really help in sensible mortgage selection.

    3: Total confusion.

    FTBs come to me often after searching the internet and getting thoroughly confused. The FSA site does not offer clarity - just more confusion.

    Clearly the FSA does not understand what a client meeting is really all about. After a long career in marketing before coming to Financial Services 20 years ago I know how important it is to “Know you business” before doing the research. That is, if you want answers that are useful.

    In conclusion:
    – this does not scare me in business terms as it will just confuse my clients even further and send them to me; but I will have an even more challenging time rescuing and re-assuring them.
    – I don’t need the FSA to try to be my competitor
    – I fear that the FSA will also scare many people off buying (or at least delay them); in a recent workshop I ran for young professionals I found that many were not buying because they did not understand how to go about it and get the right product. Confused and shying away from the decision.
    – The FSA has no right to waste our money. If we had an enquiry I expect that they would be found to be failing both us and the consumer.

    I hope the FSA is reading the comments but, even if they are, they seem to be unable to believe that they don’t really understand our market place and already have a highly professional adviser community that they carefully regulate . . . but one they do not seem to trust or be prepared to support.

    I agree they have a good role in consumer education - - - but not one in the adviser area.

  35. It is becoming obvious that FSA actually means Financial Sales Authority (The one stop state owned financial service) the only difference between the Moneysupermarket website and the FSA’s Moneymadeclear is the click here to apply button. What would it take to add the buttons that would put us all out of a job!!

  36. Ladies and Gents

    I have been with a large and highly professional business today, one that is turning over many millions of pounds; and to say he is extremely miffed with the regulator and the current situation is an understatement.

    I am so pleased that these comments are being finally aired and I feel we now have real momentum, I for one, as you may sense if you get to read some of my previous Blog entries, feel a great injustice has occurred and I will be championing our cause - that of the professional adviser.

    If you can, please get your colleagues to add comment, it would be greatly appreciated - the more we shout the more we will be heard.

    Im glad im not alone !! I thought I was the only one that felt this way.

    Your tired Trumpo.

  37. William John Says:
    March 5th, 2008 at 9:20 pm

    We sell insurance and are FSA regulated but am I correct in assuming that the FSA is not supposed to be a profit making organisation, and that the fees are only to cover running costs etc. It would be interesting to know just how much money they are currently sitting on and would it be to much to hope for a reduction in membership fees this year.

    On one of the other replys we can also confirm we have increased our fees to the general public to cover the FSA charges levied against us.

  38. I think that grotgame has it on the money - the FSA “job for the boys” comes to mind !!!

    John Doddrell - sorry to here you have had enough, I feel the same but I have 20 years invested and a young family, so unfortunately have no option but to fight on - I wish you well, but dont let them get you down !!!

  39. Those of you who are keeping track on this one - may be interested that Mortgage Next are backing the FSA campaign and encouraging us all to follow suit. WHAT A CHEEK

    Read this and then follow my reply which I emailed as per the instructions. If you feel similarly inclined - then direct your emails towards Mortgage Next

    Mortgage Next backs FSA campaign

    Mortgage Next has encouraged brokers to back the FSA’s campaign to increase consumer awareness about the range of financial options available to them.

    The FSA this week launched a £2m advertising campaign to improve consumer awareness of product options.
    Gemma Harle, managing director at Mortgage Next, said: “Brokers should consider how they can best keep their clients informed about the range of options available to them, which should not only include mortgage products but also additional services such as debt management support.”

    If you have any comments you would like to add to this story or would like to speak to Mortgage Solutions about a similar subject, telephone Ben Marquand, on 020 7484 9981 or email ben.marquand@incisivemedia.com

    MY REPLY
    Not only do I find it bizarre that Mortgage Next is giving public backing to this initiative, but the fact that they are asking Mortgage Brokers for support is outrageous.
    What on earth is Mortgage Next thinking about? Has Gemma Harle, actually given any consideration to this at all? No doubt she finds it very Politically Correct to give unconditional support to the FSA, but has clearly not considered how this impacts on Mortgage Broker Firms [remember them? The very people who supply her with her business?]

    As a Broker I found out that on - Tuesday 4th March - The FSA announced that they are to spend £2 Million, [funded by Mortgage Advisers annual regulatory fees] to market the FSA’s moneymadeclear website to help and guide clients who are about to come out of a fixed rate mortgage. Their requirement for doing this followed ‘extensive market research’ [which was incidentally based on a poll of 573 people] and from this time wasting exercise have said that if consumers find the website unhelpful they should go and speak with a lender.

    Within an hour of this going public a spokesman for the FSA went live on BBC News 24 to say that if all else fails then go to an IFA! This is an issue about Mortgage Advice not Regulated Investment Advice - Does the FSA not know the difference? The FSA have clearly lost the plot. Official government backed advice to consumers to by-pass the Intermediary Broker Market gives a strong signal that the FSA has no faith in independent mortgage advisers. They might get better value for their £2m by spending it on rooting out more of those brokerages who are employing nefarious practises, cheating the public and undermining consumer confidence.

    It seems to me that the FSA are wasting our money and do not really understand our market. I should like to remind Ms Harle, that there is a highly professional, stringently regulated adviser community in this country, who work diligently and fairly to serve the property funding consumer market.

    I should like to thank Ms Harle for he matronly arrogance but would also wish to point out that Brokers are well able to consider how they can best keep their clients informed about the range of options available to them, including mortgage products and additional services such as debt management support, without any direction from her.

    It is a terrible shame that Mortgage Next so clearly misunderstand their ’suppliers’ and even worse that the FSA do not seem to understand the industry that they are regulating. But the most bitter pill to swallow is that the FSA is actively working as a competitor to Independent Broker firms who it seems to neither trust nor is prepared to support.

    Mortgage Next have put a Face on this - so if you feel strongly enough about this, then follow up the link given by Mortgage Solutions and responded in your thousands.

    If you have any comments you would like to add to this story or would like to speak to Mortgage Solutions about a similar subject, telephone Ben Marquand, on 020 7484 9981 or email ben.marquand@incisivemedia.com

  40. Going back to basics I was under the impression that the FSA was set up as an industry ‘Regulator’ not as a ‘Consumer Advice’ body.
    Having messed up big time, with Equitable Life and Northern Rock just being the most obvious tips of the iceberg, they are now rushing around like headless chickens trying to find something to take the spotlight off their incompetence. Spending our money to do it! As someone has already said, what other industry is required to fund FREE advice to the consumer along the lines of ‘use all possible avenues elsewhere’ before, as a last resort, suggesting they go to an IFA. Not even a mention of the focused professional the ‘Mortgage Broker’.
    I believe that this is actually a long term ‘job retention exercise’, trying to justify their current existence whilst expanding their remit. This is a basic bureaucratic tactic, because these people are paid their comfortable salaries and ‘Final Salary’ pensions, out of our fees, on the basis of how many people report to them. I would have said on how many people they ‘manage’ but that would have been a misuse of the word.
    Moving on am I correct in my recollection that a House of Commons select committee recently dubbed the FSA as ‘Unfit For Purpose’? That seems spot on to me! But what is being done about it?
    However looking at the bigger picture, what is most worrying is that it is painfully apparent that the FSA does not understand the workings of most of the sectors of the Finance Industry that they were set up to regulate. They certainly do not understand that most areas of Finance depend very heavily on the public having trust and confidence in the people and institutions with which they conduct their financial affairs. They also do not understand that Financial Institutions need to have the trust of their peers. Without this confidence business becomes almost impossible and we have an overnight freeze of the Inter-Bank lending market.
    The FSA needs to be totally revamped. Ditch the Politically Correct attitude of trying to play to the public gallery and get on with the BASICS of regulation. This will, of necessity, require that the civil service ‘jobsworths’ will need to go and a few knowledgeable industry professionals be brought in. Most of the admin. and reporting could be drastically reduced and the expensive offices in Canary Wharf dumped. Oopps!! That would mean that the FSA would loose face, stature and credibility with the Finance Industry. Something that would suddenly become relevant to itself, if not to the industry it regulates!

    I’m really pleased to add my thoughts to those of you who have already posted comments above and feel less lonely realising that I’m not the only one to have such views of the shambles that is the FSA.

  41. I SO remember attending one of the first FSA awareness conferences in the City of London which was also attended by the GISC way back in 2003. The lady Chairperson confidently informed us that the proposed FSA would formulate their future Regulations from a blank peice of paper with no assistance from either the GISC nor Insurance companies. She pranced about the stage slapping a blank sheet. (I wonder if any one else attended on “Trumpo”?)

    Being asked how on earth this would be practical or even prudent, her reply was heavy handed on the basis of “it will be done”

    I had the misfortune to sit with her a lunch and on asking her opinion on “overdrafts” since there had been mention earlier, I was informed, that if a General Broker runs an overdraft he / she will not be in a position to look after the client base properly! It did not interest her to be given examples of general business practice.

    My pointing out that my company does not hold client money in any shape or form and that an overdraft was entirely my own affair, should I want one, received her curt reply “beware then”!!!

    Of course, all the “experts” were, in fact consulted, but at the time, we left the building feeling that the “End was Nigh”.

    With all the “consultation” that did ensure, it is quite obvious that the FSA was unable to grasp then and to date still hasn’t, that their onerous and in the main unecessary Regulations have driven thousands of highly competent small firms out of business thereby depriving truely independent advice to the general public.

    AS said, since my company does not collect client funds, why the need for twice yearly reporting of accounts including Balance Sheets when only Incorportaed companies are required to do so and only once a year, at that!

    Cameron is said to want to reform this all powerful quango but I suspect his time will be taken up with similar vastly important legislation such as “plasic bags” should he ever become prime Minister.

    In Wilson’s time, the saying was:

    “will the last businessman leaving Britain please turn out the lights”

    A joke then but getting too near the mark now for my liking

  42. Roger, a little humour always eases the pain, unfortunately due to raising fuel bills, the lights are being swtiched off by the Govt right now!

  43. As always the FSA have no ideabout whats happening on the street.

Leave a Reply